Turn early tissue signal into
evidence a program
can act on.
Nucleai Insight quantifies what is actually on the slide, then tests it against clinical outcomes. It answers key questions translational research keeps returning to: what is in this tissue, why did the drug work, and in whom. And the analysis can run inside your own environment when your data cannot leave it.
One offering, two questions
Analyze: What is actually in this tissue?

In a multi-site validation with Merck KGaA presented at USCAP 2023, a deep learning PD-L1 TPS scoring model was trained across five laboratories, three scanners, and two antibody clones on roughly 100,000 pathologist-annotated cells. It was then validated against two independent pathologists on an unseen 107-slide cohort at an R² of 0.91 against pathologist consensus. In a separate study presented at SITC 2023, pairing low-plex multiplex imaging with same-slide H&E reclassified six million previously marker-negative cells and identified tertiary lymphoid structures at 88% accuracy.

Translational pathologists and clinical biomarker leads scoping a first program engagement.
Two ways to start

Nucleai can assess a delivered slide set on its own, flagging which slides will be excluded and why, and what that means for the analysis that is actually achievable. Sponsors routinely do not have this information about their own cohorts until after the fact.

Nucleai can shape the assay before staining, not analyzing after it. Nucleai works alongside sponsors and staining labs to build AI-readiness into panel design, set marker concentrations for quantitative rather than visual review, and catch weak dynamic range before it compromises cell calls downstream.
Profile & Predict: why did the drug work, and in whom?

In a peer-reviewed collaboration with Adlai Nortye published in Cancers (2026), spatial features read from randomized Phase 2 H&E were associated with overall survival benefit.

Clinical biomarker leads, supported by a computational biology team.
Proven in translational research